Mehta Rukminesh v. Maggie Kuhl
Mehta Rukminesh v. Maggie Kuhl
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1076
MEHTA RUKMINESH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAGGIE KUHL, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:20-cv-00131-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: May 20, 2021 Decided: May 25, 2021
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mehta Rukminesh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Mehta Rukminesh appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mehta v. Kuhl, No. 3:20-cv-00131-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 4 & 7, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.