Randolph Johnson v. Labravia Jenkins
Randolph Johnson v. Labravia Jenkins
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6191
RANDOLPH WAKEEM JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LABRAVIA J. JENKINS, in Public and Private Capacity; PAUL W. HIGGS, In Public and Private Capacity; ERIC OLSEN, In Public and Private Capacity; MICHAEL HARDIMAN, In Public and Private Capacity; DAVID P. DECATUR, In Public and Private Capacity, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-01421-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: May 25, 2021 Decided: May 28, 2021
Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randolph Wakeem Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Randolph Wakeem Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure either to pay the filing fee or to move to proceed in forma pauperis. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Johnson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.