U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2021

Gregory Richardson v. Director

Gregory Richardson v. Director
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 4, 2021

Gregory Richardson v. Director

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7552

GREGORY RICHARDSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:20-cv-00018-MFU-JCH)

Submitted: June 1, 2021 Decided: June 4, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory A. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Gregory Richardson appeals the order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia transferring his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Richardson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See In re Carefirst of Md., Inc., 305 F.3d 253, 256 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.