United States v. Daniel Greear
United States v. Daniel Greear
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7891
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DANIEL JAY GREEAR, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00015-JPJ-PMS-10)
Submitted: June 1, 2021 Decided: June 7, 2021
Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Jay Greear, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Daniel Jay Greear appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We review a district court’s denial of a motion for compassionate release for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Greear, No. 2:15-cr-00015-JPJ-PMS-10 (W.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.