U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2021

Daryl Green v. Prince George's County

Daryl Green v. Prince George's County
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 22, 2021

Daryl Green v. Prince George's County

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1036

DARYL A. GREEN, Debtor - Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, Creditors - Appellees, and TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Trustee.

No. 21-1047

DARYL ANTHONY GREEN, Debtor - Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT, Creditor - Appellee, and TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Trustee.

No. 21-1048

DARYL ANTHONY GREEN, Debtor - Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT, Creditor - Appellee, and TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Trustee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.

Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:20-cv-01201-TDC; 8:19-cv-03449-TDC; 8:20- cv-01765-TDC)

Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daryl A. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Hess Rohrbaugh, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Daryl A. Green appeals from the district court’s order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his separate appeals from the bankruptcy court’s orders: (1) denying without prejudice his motion to compel discovery (No. 21-1036); (2) denying his motion to dismiss the Creditor’s proof of claim (No. 21-1047); and (3) denying his motion to dismiss the Creditor’s motion to dismiss his bankruptcy case (No. 21-1048). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. Prince George’s Cnty. Ofc. of Child Support Enf’t, Nos. 8:20-cv-01201-TDC, 8:19-cv-3449-TDC, 8:20-cv-01765-TDC (D. Md. Dec. 23, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.