William Taccino v. Edmund Taccino
William Taccino v. Edmund Taccino
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1966
WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDMUND J. TACCINO, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:20-cv-02160-GLR)
Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: August 5, 2021
Before FLOYD, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Taccino, No. 1:20-cv- 02160-GLR (D. Md. filed Aug. 6, 2020 & entered Aug. 7, 2020). We deny Taccino’s motions objecting to the validity of the briefing order and to remand this case to the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.