U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2021

Alfred Adkins v. Christopher Gomez

Alfred Adkins v. Christopher Gomez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 27, 2021

Alfred Adkins v. Christopher Gomez

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6313

ALFRED BRADLEY ADKINS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:19-cv-00112-GMG)

Submitted: August 24, 2021 Decided: August 27, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Bradley Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Alfred Bradley Adkins, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Respondent’s dispositive motion and deny relief on Adkins’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adkins v. Gomez, No. 3:19-cv-00112-GMG (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 4, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.