Stanley Ewan v. United States
Stanley Ewan v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1425
STANLEY H.R. EWAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DOE(s) I, OSI Special Agent(s) Responsible for Destruction of Property; DOE(s) II, Staff Judge Advocate(s) Responsible for Destruction of Property, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-02398-CCB)
Submitted: September 14, 2021 Decided: September 17, 2021
Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley H.R. Ewan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Stanley H.R. Ewan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.