Adesijuola Ogunjobi v. United Nations
Adesijuola Ogunjobi v. United Nations
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1694
ADESIJUOLA OGUNJOBI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
TOKS BANC CORP; TOKS; 5 WORLD MARKETS CORPORATION; WORLD MARKETS TRANSFER AGENCY CORPORATION; GLOBAL PROSPERITY CORPORATION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; ORGANIZATION OF THE PETROLEUM EXPORTING COUNTRIES (OPEC); TREASURY DEPARTMENT OF THE UNITED STATES; FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF THE UNITED STATES; FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND; INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE; ASSOCIATION OF TENNIS PROFESSIONALS; WOMEN’S TENNIS PROFESSIONALS; INTERNATIONAL TENNIS FEDERATION; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION; MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL; MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER; CHARLES, PRINCE OF WALES; IDRIS ELBA, Actor, Singer, Producer; SABRINA DHOWRE ELBA, Fashion Model; DAK PRESCOTT, Quarterback; DALLAS COWBOYS; BRIAN ALLEN, Offensive Lineman; LOS ANGELES RAMS; MADONNA LOUISE CICCONE, Singer, Songwriter; DEMOCRATIC PARTY; REPUBLICAN PARTY; MEMBERS OF THE CLASS AND SUBCLASSES, and those similarly situated; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; DONALD J. TRUMP; MELANIA TRUMP; THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED NATIONS; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION,
Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:20-cv-00393-HEH)
Submitted: September 13, 2021 Decided: September 21, 2021
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adesijuola Ogunjobi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Adesijuola Ogunjobi appeals the district court’s order dismissing for failure to state
a claim his civil complaint in which he sought to file a class action against the United
Nations, the World Health Organization, and the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention based on his contention that COVID-19 is a hoax. We have reviewed the record
and find that his claims are frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We
grant Ogunjobi’s motions to amend and deny his motions for an expedited decision and a
stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished