In re: Thomas Brock

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In re: Thomas Brock

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1990

In re: THOMAS BROCK,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:05-cr-00116-D-2)

Submitted: September 28, 2021 Decided: October 6, 2021

Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Brock, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Brock petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has

unduly delayed acting on his motion for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First

Step Act of 2018,

Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132

Stat. 5194. He seeks an order from this court

directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the

district court has granted in part and denied in part Brock’s motion. Accordingly, because

the district court has recently decided Brock’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as

moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished