Adam Hall v. Thomas Hamilton
Adam Hall v. Thomas Hamilton
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7160
ADAM W. HALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS A. HAMILTON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:18-cv-00365-MR)
Submitted: October 14, 2021 Decided: October 19, 2021
Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adam W. Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Adam W. Hall appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for
summary judgment and dismissing with prejudice Hall’s
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint for
failure to properly exhaust his administrative remedies. On appeal, we confine our review
to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hall’s informal
brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177(4th Cir.
2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished