Ben Pourbabai v. John Fitzgerald, III

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ben Pourbabai v. John Fitzgerald, III

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2101

BEN POURBABAI,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III,

Trustee - Appellee,

and

JANET MARIE MEIBURGER, Chapter 7 Trustee,

Trustee.

No. 20-2121

BEN POURBABAI,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

KYLE E. SKOPIC,

Creditor - Appellee.

No. 20-2136 BEN POURBABAI,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III,

Trustee - Appellee,

and

JANET MARIE MEIBURGER, Chapter 7 Trustee,

Trustee.

No. 20-2138

BEN POURBABAI,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

UNKNOWN,

Party-in-Interest.

No. 20-2152

In re: BEN POURBABAI,

Debtor. -----------------------------------------

BEN POURBABAI,

2 Debtor - Appellant,

v.

JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III,

Trustee - Appellee,

and

JANET MARIE MEIBURGER, Chapter 7 Trustee,

Trustee.

No. 21-1434

BEN POURBABAI,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III,

Trustee - Appellee,

and

JANET MARIE MEIBURGER, Chapter 7 Trustee,

Trustee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge, and Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-00910-LO-MSN; 1:20-cv-00849-LO-MSN; 1:20-cv-00015-LO-MSN; 1:20-cv-00735-LO-MSN; 1:19-cv-00401-RDA-JFA)

Submitted: October 19, 2021 Decided: October 21, 2021

3 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ben Pourbabai, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Michael Bernstein, Baltimore, Maryland, Michael T. Freeman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

4 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Ben Pourbabai appeals the district court’s orders

denying a number of postjudgment motions and imposing a prefiling injunction. We have

reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Pourbabai v. Fitzgerald, No. 1:20-cv-00910-LO-MSN (E.D.

Va. Sept. 4, 2020 & entered Sept. 8; filed Sept. 17, 2020 & entered Sept. 18, 2020);

Pourbabai v. Skopic, No. 1:20-cv-00849-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 4, 2020 & entered

Sept. 8, 2020; filed Sept. 17, 2020 & entered Sept. 18, 2020); Pourbabai v. Fitzgerald, No.

1:20-cv-00015-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. Sept 4, 2020 & entered Sept. 8, 2020; filed Sept. 17,

2020 & entered Sept. 18, 2020; Mar. 30, 2021); Pourbabai v. Unknown, No. 1:20-cv-

00735-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. Sept. 4, 2020 & entered Sept. 8, 2020; filed Sept. 17, 2020 &

entered Sept. 18, 2020); In re Pourbabai, No. 1:19-cv-00401-RDA-JFA (E.D. Va. Sept. 9,

2020). We deny as moot Pourbabai’s motion to proceed pro se and we dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

5

Reference

Status
Unpublished