Allaudin Rana v. Merrick Garland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Allaudin Rana v. Merrick Garland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2235

ALLAUDIN AHMAD RANA,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: October 19, 2021 Decided: October 21, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc Seguinót, SEGUINÓT & ASSOCIATES, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director, Todd J. Cochran, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Allaudin Ahmad Rana, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying Rana’s motion for sua sponte

reopening or reconsideration. Upon review of the parties’ briefs, considered in conjunction

with the administrative record and the relevant authorities, we agree with the Attorney

General that we lack jurisdiction to review the subject order. See Lawrence v. Lynch,

826 F.3d 198, 206-07

(4th Cir. 2016) (affirming that this court “lack[s] jurisdiction to review

how the Board exercises its sua sponte discretion”); Mosere v. Mukasey,

552 F.3d 397, 400-01

(4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we dismiss this petition for review for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished