U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2021

John Henoud v. Warden T. Scarantino

John Henoud v. Warden T. Scarantino
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 17, 2021

John Henoud v. Warden T. Scarantino

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7905

JOHN MAURICE HENOUD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN T. SCARANTINO, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:20-hc-02038-FL)

Submitted: November 10, 2021 Decided: November 17, 2021

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Maurice Henoud, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: John Maurice Henoud appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition seeking to challenge his federal convictions for lack of jurisdiction. ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Henoud v. Scarantino, No. 5:20-hc-02038-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 25, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ On appeal, Henoud has notified this court that he was placed in home confinement pursuant to the CARES Act, but he remains in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons. See United States v. Saunders, 986 F.3d 1076, 1078 (7th Cir. 2021).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.