Raleigh Rogers v. Wells Fargo

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Raleigh Rogers v. Wells Fargo

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1646

RALEIGH ROGERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (5:19-cv-00006-RJC)

Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 19, 2021

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raleigh Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Raleigh Rogers appeals the district court’s order granting Wells Fargo’s motion to

dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Rogers v. Wells Fargo, No. 5:19-cv-00006-RJC

(W.D.N.C. May 3, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished