Kenrick Hamilton v. Northern Virginia District Office
Kenrick Hamilton v. Northern Virginia District Office
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1952
KENRICK C. HAMILTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORTHERN VIRGINIA DISTRICT OFFICE, Support Enforcement Specialist; SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT, County of Cattaraugus,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:20-cv-00644-RDA-MSN)
Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 19, 2021
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenrick Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kenrick Hamilton appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation and dismissing Hamilton’s civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction and
failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hamilton’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177(4th Cir. 2014) (“The
informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited
to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished