Derrick Allen, Sr. v. Chief Prignano
Derrick Allen, Sr. v. Chief Prignano
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6476
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHIEF PRIGNANO,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cv-01169-TDS-LPA)
Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 19, 2021
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Derrick M. Allen, Sr., a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing his
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition. The district court referred this case to a
magistrate judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge
recommended dismissing the petition and advised Allen that failure to file timely, specific
objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order
based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is
necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the
parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v. Duffy,
858 F.3d 239, 245(4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins,
766 F.2d 841, 846-47(4th Cir. 1985); see
also Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 154-55(1985). Allen has waived appellate review by
failing to file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving proper
notice.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished