United States v. Kevin Heiting

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Kevin Heiting

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6925

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEVIN HEITING,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:16-cr-00434-PX-1)

Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 22, 2021

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Heiting, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ronald Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kevin Heiting appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking

compassionate release pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Heiting, No. 8:16-cr-00434-PX-1 (D. Md. June 2, 2021).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished