United States v. Thomas Brock
United States v. Thomas Brock
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7370
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
THOMAS BROCK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (7:05-cr-00116-D-2)
Submitted: December 3, 2021 Decided: December 14, 2021
Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Brock, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Joshua L. Rogers, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Thomas Brock appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part
his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018,
Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132Stat. 5194. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States
v. Brock, No. 7:05-cr-00116-D-2 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 2021). We deny Brock’s pending
motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished