United States v. Leo Percell, Jr.
United States v. Leo Percell, Jr.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7290
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LEO VISTOR PERCELL, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:19-cr-00190-NCT-1)
Submitted: November 19, 2021 Decided: December 16, 2021
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leo Vistor Percell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Leo Vistor Percell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Before seeking compassionate
release in the district court, an inmate must satisfy the threshold requirement of
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). However, as we recently held, this requirement is nonjurisdictional and,
thus, subject to forfeiture or waiver if not timely raised. See United States v. Muhammad,
16 F.4th 126, 129-30(4th Cir. 2021).
Here, the district court—which did not have the benefit of our decision in
Muhammad—erred by sua sponte raising the threshold requirement and dismissing on that
basis. See
id. at 130. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand for
further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished