Michael Hill v. Michael Revells
Michael Hill v. Michael Revells
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2110
MICHAEL WAYNE HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL WAYNE REVELLS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:20-cv-00233-FL)
Submitted: December 16, 2021 Decided: December 17, 2021
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Wayne Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael Wayne Hill appeals the district court’s order denying his postjudgment motion for order of regress. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Revells, No. 4:20-cv-00233-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.