U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2021

Joseph Clark, II v. Shawn Britt

Joseph Clark, II v. Shawn Britt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 17, 2021

Joseph Clark, II v. Shawn Britt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6832

JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHAWN LINDSEY BRITT; MONICA ROSE ALMODOVAR; KATY POOLE; PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR; RONALD COVINGTON; DEAN LOCKLEAR; TOYA COLLINS; JUSTIN CHAVIS; JAMIE HAMMONDS; QUEEN E. GERALD; ZERRANTI MCLEAN; SELENA BARTEE; REGINALD MEWBORN; ELIZABETH D. WALLACE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00493-CCE-JEP)

Submitted: December 16, 2021 Decided: December 17, 2021

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Earl Clark, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Joseph Earl Clark, II, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying in part relief on Clark’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, and granting default judgment in favor of Clark against one Defendant on one of Clark’s claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.