United States v. Tyrone Johnson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Tyrone Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6853

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TYRONE ANTHONY JOHNSON, a/k/a Tyrone A. Johnson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:10-cr-00692-PWG-1)

Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: December 22, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John M. McKenna, BRENNAN MCKENNA & LAWLOR, CHTD., Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Jonathan F. Lenzner, Acting United States Attorney, Thomas M. Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Anthony Johnson appeals the district court’s orders denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release and denying reconsideration. We

review a district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion.

United States v. Kibble,

992 F.3d 326

, 329 (4th Cir. 2021), cert. denied, No. 21-5624,

2021 WL 4733616

(U.S. Oct. 12, 2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the

court did not abuse its discretion and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. See

United States v. High,

997 F.3d 181

, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of

explanation required for denial of compassionate release motion). We therefore affirm the

district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished