United States v. Jerome Heath
United States v. Jerome Heath
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7461
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEROME RAMAAL HEATH, a/k/a Ro,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cr-00035-RGD-RJK-1)
Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: January 11, 2022
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Ramaal Heath, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jerome Ramaal Heath, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order
denying his third motion for compassionate release pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A),
as amended by the First Step Act of 2018,
Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1),
132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We review a district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for
abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble,
992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,
142 S. Ct. 383(2021). We have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion. See
United States v. High,
997 F.3d 181, 189 (4th Cir. 2021) (affirming district court’s order
denying compassionate release where “[t]he court’s rationale . . . was both rational and
legitimate” and “the court sufficiently explained its denial to allow for meaningful
appellate review” (internal quotation marks omitted)). We therefore affirm the district
court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished