Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. DVA

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. DVA

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1695

ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DVA; REGIONAL VA OFFICE MARTINSBURG; JANESVILLE CLAIMS INTAKE CENTER; PHILADELPHIA PENSION CENTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:21-cv-00022-GMG)

Submitted: January 4, 2022 Decided: January 20, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hairston v. DVA,

No. 3:21-cv-00022-GMG (N.D.W. Va. June 8, 2021). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished