Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. DVA
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. DVA
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1695
ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DVA; REGIONAL VA OFFICE MARTINSBURG; JANESVILLE CLAIMS INTAKE CENTER; PHILADELPHIA PENSION CENTER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:21-cv-00022-GMG)
Submitted: January 4, 2022 Decided: January 20, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hairston v. DVA, No. 3:21-cv-00022-GMG (N.D.W. Va. June 8, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.