Albert Mills v. Maryland Department of Public
Albert Mills v. Maryland Department of Public
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7240
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; LAWRENCE J.
HOGAN, Governor; BOYD K. RUTHERFORD, Lieutenant Governor; JOHN DOE, Chief of Security; JOHN DOE, Major; CAPTAIN WALTER ISER; LIEUTENANT THOMAS SAWYERS; LIEUTENANT VAUGHN WHITEMAN; ROBERT L.
GREEN, Secretary; JOHN DOE, Assistant Warden; SERGEANT APRIL CARR; ICKES, Correctional Officer; JESSE RITCHEY, Correctional Officer II; JASON ELKINS, Correctional Officer II; RICHARD RODERICK, Correctional Case Management Manager; JOHN G. SINDY, Correctional Case Management Specialist; S. JOHNSON, Case Management Specialist; F. TODD TAYLOR, Executive Director; JEFF NINES, Warden; FRANK BISHOP; STEPHEN T.
MOYER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:20-cv-00432-DKC)
Submitted: January 26, 2022 Decided: February 9, 2022
Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Albert Curtis Mills appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motions to dismiss Mills’ complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mills v. Md. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, No. 8:20-cv-00432-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.