United States v. Hector Carranza
United States v. Hector Carranza
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7536
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HECTOR JOSE CARRANZA, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:20-cr-00203-CCE-5)
Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 23, 2022
Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hector Jose Carranza, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Hector Jose Carranza appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), and denying his motion for the appointment of counsel. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Carranza’s motions. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.