United States v. Lee Riggins, Jr.
United States v. Lee Riggins, Jr.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7539
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LEE TRACY RIGGINS, JR., a/k/a Gucci, a/k/a Guwap, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:17-cr-00108-BHH-14)
Submitted: February 24, 2022 Decided: March 1, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lee Tracy Riggins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Everett E. McMillian, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lee Tracy Riggins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Riggins, No. 4:17-cr-00108-BHH-14 (D.S.C. Oct. 19, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.