U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2022

Susan Woodard v. SDH Services East

Susan Woodard v. SDH Services East
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 15, 2022

Susan Woodard v. SDH Services East

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2300

SUSAN WOODARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SDH SERVICES EAST, Defendant - Appellee, and WHITNEY BETTIE, General Manager; LOREE SORENSON, Senior Manager, Employee Relations, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (0:19-cv-00335-CMC)

Submitted: February 28, 2022 Decided: March 15, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Susan Woodard, Appellant Pro Se. William Lee Duda, Christopher Ray Thomas, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Susan Woodard appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her employment discrimination complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, 41(b), as a sanction for her failure to comply with discovery rules. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodard v. SDH Servs. E., No. 0:19-cv-00335-CMC (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.