Edward Witherspoon v. Frank Bishop
Edward Witherspoon v. Frank Bishop
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No 21-7741
EDWARD WITHERSPOON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. FRANK B. BISHOP; MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:19-cv-00544-TDC)
Submitted: March 24, 2022 Decided: March 29, 2022
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Edward Witherspoon seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, pursuant to Witherspoon’s request to voluntarily withdraw his claims so that he could exhaust his state remedies. A Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) voluntary dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Unioil, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton & Co., 809 F.2d 548, 555 (9th Cir. 1986) (holding that a plaintiff generally may not appeal a voluntary dismissal without prejudice because it is not an involuntary adverse judgment against him), overruled in part on other grounds by In re Keegan Mgmt. Co., 78 F.3d 431, 434-35 (9th Cir. 1996).
Accordingly, we deny Witherspoon’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.