United States v. Guillermo Salazar-Velasquez
United States v. Guillermo Salazar-Velasquez
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GUILLERMO SALAZAR-VELASQUEZ, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:08-cr-00904-RMG-1)
Submitted: March 9, 2021 Decided: March 31, 2022
Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, * Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Guillermo Salazar-Velasquez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
* Judge Floyd has dissented in this opinion.
PER CURIAM: Guillermo Salazar-Velasquez appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Salazar-Velasquez, No. 2:08-cr-00904-RMG-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 8 & Oct. 26, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.