UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1009

SUSHILA GAUR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ATTORNEY JAMES MILLIKAN, Office of Public Defender; OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER; OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:21-cv-03055-GJH)

Submitted: March 29, 2022 Decided: April 1, 2022

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sushila Gaur, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sushila Gaur appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gaur’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED