United States v. James Sumter
United States v. James Sumter
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 21-7510 Doc: 7 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7510
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES LATRON SUMTER, a/k/a T,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:18-cr-00772-RBH-1)
Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2022
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Latron Sumter, Appellant Pro Se. Everett E. McMillian, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7510 Doc: 7 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James Latron Sumter appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for
compassionate release pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First
Step Act of 2018,
Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1),
132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Upon review
of the record, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that
the pertinent
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors weighed against compassionate release. See
United States v. Kibble,
992 F.3d 326, 329(4th Cir.) (providing standard of review and
outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release motions), cert. denied,
142 S. Ct. 383(2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished