Judson Witham v. United States Government
Judson Witham v. United States Government
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2071 Doc: 5 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2071
JUDSON WITHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT; TERRENCE W. BOYLE; INTERNATIONAL PAPER AND POWER INC.; DEC NEW YORK STATE; STATE OF NEW YORK; ANDREW CUOMO, Governor; BASIL SEGGOS, Commissioner DEC; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; EMPLOYEES FOR NEW YORK STATE; 1 - 10 (BIVENS ACTION); WARREN COUNTY, NEW YORK; NYS DEC; THE LAKE GEORGE PARK COMMISSION; NEW YORK STATE CONSERVATION COM; STATE OF VERMONT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:20-cv-00385-M)
Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judson Witham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-2071 Doc: 5 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Judson Witham appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Witham’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s
disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under
Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished