USCA4 Appeal: 21-2177 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-2177

CLARENCE B. JENKINS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT WORKFORCE; SOUTH CAROLINA HUMAN AFFAIRS COMMISSION; SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION; OFFICE OF SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:21-cv-01606-TLW)

Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayne Hodges, III, Lillian Marshall Coleman Newton, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2177 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Jenkins’ civil complaint and the court’s text order denying Jenkins’ motion for reconsideration. We conclude that the district court correctly determined that Jenkins failed to properly exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing his complaint under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We also conclude that the district court judge and the magistrate judge did not abuse their discretion in denying Jenkins’ motion to recuse. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Jenkins v. S.C. Dep’t of Emp.

Workforce, No. 3:21-cv-01606-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 27 & Oct. 13, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED