Bor-Tyng Sheen v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bor-Tyng Sheen v. United States

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1626 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1626

BOR-TYNG SHEEN; FANG LUN TSAO; FUNG I. YUAN; TZU-KUAN LIN; CHEN-YU WEI; WEN-WANG YANG,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:20-cv-00225-M)

Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bor-Tyng Sheen; Fang Lun Tsao; Fung I. Yuan; Tzu-Kuan Lin; Chen-Yu Wei; Wen-Wang Yang, Appellants Pro Se. Asia Jamar Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1626 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Bor-Tyng Sheen, Fang Lun Tsao, Fung I. Yuan, Tzu-Kuan Lin, Chen-Yu Wei, and

Wen-Wang Yang (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sheen v. United

States, No. 5:20-cv-00225-M (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2021). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished