U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2022

Timothy King v. Erik Hooks

Timothy King v. Erik Hooks
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 7, 2022

Timothy King v. Erik Hooks

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6561 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/07/2022 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6561

TIMOTHY ROYAL KING, Plaintiff - Appellant, and MICHAEL BLANKEY; DERICK WHITE; DAYVON D. PERSON; LARRY FULLER; TIMOTHY BOYD; CHRIS PEARSALL; JIMMY TINSLEY; RONALD BLAIR WINSTEAD; GREGORY PORTER; CORTNEY LEACH; MILTON L.

LAWRENCE; JOHN MCNEILL; XAVIER KINNEY; IRVIN VASQUEZ; DONALD USEVICH, Plaintiffs, v. ERIK A. HOOKS; W. DAVID GUICE; CYNTHIA THORNTON; MELANIE SHELTON; KENNETH LASSITER; BETTY BROWN; SUSAN ADDAMS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03043-FL)

Submitted: January 25, 2022 Decided: February 7, 2022

Before AGEE, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6561 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/07/2022 Pg: 2 of 3

Timothy Royal King, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6561 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/07/2022 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM: Timothy Royal King appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment on his civil rights complaint in which he raised claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Hooks, No. 5:17-ct-03043-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2020; Mar. 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.