U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2022

United States v. Christopher Silver

United States v. Christopher Silver
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 22, 2022

United States v. Christopher Silver

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7267 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7267

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER LEE SILVER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:15-cr-00001-D-1)

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 22, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Lee Silver, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, Joshua L. Rogers, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7267 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Christopher Lee Silver appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, and denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motion for copies of case documents. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Silver, No. 5:15-cr- 00001-D-1 (E.D.N.C June 24, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.