In re: Henry Miller
In re: Henry Miller
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1120 Doc: 7 Filed: 03/07/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1120
In re: HENRY EARL MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:04-cr-00022-JMC-3)
Submitted: February 15, 2022 Decided: March 7, 2022
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se. Brandon Batson Hinton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1120 Doc: 7 Filed: 03/07/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his writ of error coram nobis. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.