U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2022

Clara Brockington v. Kimbrell's Furniture

Clara Brockington v. Kimbrell's Furniture
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 23, 2022

Clara Brockington v. Kimbrell's Furniture

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2376 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2376

CLARA LEWIS BROCKINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KIMBRELL’S FURNITURE OF FLORENCE; MIKE ELLIS, Store Manager; KIMBRELL’S CORPORATE OFFICE; TERRY PETERS, Vice President; CAROL FAIRCLOTH, Regional Manager; CINDY MORRISON, Credit Manager; FORTEGRA INSURANCE CO. LIFE OF SOUTH; VIVIAN GOHERTRY, Claims Dept.; FAST FURNITURE REPAIRS; RON EASLEY, Store Manager; RICK S.

KAHLBAUGH, CEO Fortegra Life, Defendants - Appellees, and LACY DE TEMPLE, Kimbrell’s Claim Dept.; JOSIE WHEELER, Store Manager of Sam’s Furniture; S.C. DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE; DIANE COOPER, Insurance Manager of S.C. Department of Insurance; NANDI J. CHOLER, Insurance Analyst, S.C. Dept. of Insurance, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.

R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:20-cv-03270-RBH)

Submitted: March 14, 2022 Decided: March 23, 2022

Before WYNN and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2376 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clara Lewis Brockington, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2376 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/23/2022 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM: Clara Lewis Brockington appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint without prejudice.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brockington v. Kimbrell’s Furniture of Florence, No. 4:20-cv-03270-RBH (D.S.C. Nov. 19, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.