USCA4 Appeal: 20-7835 Doc: 18 Filed: 05/18/2022 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7835

DARRELL L. GOSS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRYAN P. STIRLING; CHARLES WILLIAMS; THOMAS ROBERTSON; ALYSON GLADWELL; STEPHANIE MARSHALL; OFFICER STANLEY TERRY; LIEUTENANT CLARISSA JONES; DEBORAH RICHTER; JENNIFER FRANKLIN, Mailroom Director; SERGEANT WARREN PEEK; VERDEIA HALL, Corporal; CHARLES CROSBY, Officer; CARLOS RIVERA, Officer; JUANITA MOSS; WILLIE SMITH; CHAPLAIN NEDENIA PARKER-BARBER; CANTEEN MANAGER GEORGIA YELDELL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (6:18-cv-03245-BHH)

Submitted: January 12, 2022 Decided: May 18, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell L. Goss, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Garfield, CROWE LAFAVE LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; Andrew Lindemann, LINDEMANN & DAVIS, P.A., USCA4 Appeal: 20-7835 Doc: 18 Filed: 05/18/2022 Pg: 2 of 3

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-7835 Doc: 18 Filed: 05/18/2022 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM: Darrell L. Goss appeals from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment to several Defendants on his claims under the First and Eighth Amendments and dismissing with prejudice the remaining Defendants and claims against them under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goss v. Stirling, No. 6:18-cv-03245-BHH (D.S.C. Dec. 2, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED