Darrell Goss v. Shontate Morley
Darrell Goss v. Shontate Morley
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 21-7343 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/09/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7343
DARRELL L. GOSS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and SASHA GASKINS, Plaintiff, v. SHONTATE MORLEY; MARY BRUMEUCCHI; CHRISTINE LONG; S.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; BRYAN P. STIRLING, Defendants - Appellees, and PATTY BRITT-POOSER, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:19-cv-02469-BHH)
Submitted: July 29, 2022 Decided: August 9, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-7343 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/09/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrell L. Goss, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK LAW FIRM, LLC, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-7343 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/09/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM: Darrell L. Goss appeals the district court’s order adopting in part and modifying in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants in his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goss v. Morley, No. 2:19-cv-02469-BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.