Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6696 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/12/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6696
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DARLENE DICKEY; WILLIAM EDDINS; SARAH HARPER-CRUTCHFIELD; GREGORY MARCILLE; TIMOTHY REGISTER; THOMAS WILLIAMS; JANE DOES 1-10; JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (3:20-cv-01335-JMC)
Submitted: August 5, 2022 Decided: August 12, 2022
Before DIAZ, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Michael Ardis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6696 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/12/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Robert Michael Ardis appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Ardis’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ardis v. Dickey, No. 3:20-cv-01335-JMC (D.S.C. filed Jan. 25, 2021 & entered Jan. 26, 2021). We deny Ardis’ motions for a stay and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.