U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2022

Carnell McElroy v. Harold Clarke

Carnell McElroy v. Harold Clarke
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 8, 2022

Carnell McElroy v. Harold Clarke

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6080 Doc: 21 Filed: 09/08/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6080

CARNELL DION MCELROY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director of D.O.C.; GREGORY L. HOLLOWAY; WARDEN KAISER; I.M.P. BAKER; I.M.P. SYKES; C. CAUTHORNE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:21-cv-00091-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: August 12, 2022 Decided: September 8, 2022

Before WYNN and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6080 Doc: 21 Filed: 09/08/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting the Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See McElroy v. Clarke, No. 7:21-cv-00091-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2022). We deny the motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.