Kevin Doherty v. Richard Ashby
Kevin Doherty v. Richard Ashby
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6356 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6356
KEVIN DOHERTY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD B. ASHBY, Defendant - Appellee, and BETH ARTHUR, ACDF Sheriff; JAMES HYMAN; COUNTY OF ARLINGTON, VA; DANBI MALLIN, Physicians Assistant; MARJORIE BURRIS, Nurse; CORIZON HEALTH; NAME UNKNOWN CORIZON PHYSICIAN’S ASSISTANT; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; M. B. NELLIS, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cv-00420-HEH-EWH)
Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 13, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6356 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
Kevin Doherty, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6356 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM: Kevin Doherty appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Upon review of the record, * we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doherty v. Corizon Health, No. 3:19- cv-00420-HEH (E.D. Va. May 28, 2021; June 16, 2021; Jan. 6, 2022; Mar. 14, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although we grant Doherty’s motion to review the full record, we deny his motion to certify the appeal as non-frivolous for purposes of preparation of transcripts at Government expense, 28 U.S.C. § 753(f).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.