George Farmer v. James Kent
George Farmer v. James Kent
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1350 Doc: 18 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1350
GEORGE L. FARMER, Esq., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. LAURENCE KENT, Esq.; JOHN KIDWELL, Esq.; KIDWELL & KENT, a Maryland Partnership, individually, jointly and severally, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:20-cv-01806-TDC)
Submitted: August 9, 2022 Decided: September 27, 2022
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George L. Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Nachowitz Steel, WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DECKER LLP, Washington, D.C.; Robert William Burton, Alvin Frederick, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1350 Doc: 18 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: George L. Farmer appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss his amended complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Farmer v. Kent, No. 8:20-cv-01806-TDC (D. Md. Feb. 23, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.