Dianne Nickles v. Tabitha Gwynn
Dianne Nickles v. Tabitha Gwynn
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1649 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/17/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1649
DIANNE G. NICKLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TABITHA BONITA GWYNN, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge; L. Patrick Auld, Magistrate Judge. (1:22-cv-00109-TDS-LPA)
Submitted: October 13, 2022 Decided: October 17, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dianne G. Nickles, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1649 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/17/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Dianne G. Nickles seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s text order remanding her action to state court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The magistrate judge entered the text order on February 9, 2022. Nickles’ notice of appeal is considered filed on June 9, 2022, when it was received by this court. Because Nickles failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.