Tiesha Evans v. April Leroy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Tiesha Evans v. April Leroy

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1482 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1482

TIESHA EVANS; KATHY REAVES,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

APRIL LEROY, Individually and Professional Capacity; OFFICER MCCOLL, Individually; CHIEF ALLEN HEIDLER; RICHARD O’MALLEY; HALL ROSS, Individually and Professional; MOLLY SPEARMAN; TERESA MYERS ERVIN; K. G. SMITH, JR.; MARK KEEL; HENRY MCMASTER; CHRISTOPHER WRAY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge; Thomas E. Rogers, III, Magistrate Judge. (4:22- cv-01150-TLW-TER)

Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 20, 2022

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tiesha Evans and Kathy Reaves, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1482 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Tiesha Evans and Kathy Reaves seek to appeal the magistrate judge’s order

directing them to secure counsel to represent a minor child. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

, and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949). The order Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished