Paul Okanes v. SWIFT, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Paul Okanes v. SWIFT, Inc.

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2437 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-2437

PAUL OKANES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOCIETY FOR WORLDWIDE INTERBANK FINANCIAL TELECOMMUNICATION SC, d/b/a S.W.I.F.T., Inc.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00285-LO-TCB)

Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 20, 2022

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Okanes, Appellant Pro Se. Genevieve Claire Bradley, McLean, Virginia, Sean Michael Gibbons, ROTH JACKSON GIBBONS CONDLIN, PLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-2437 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Paul Okanes appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se Fed. R. Civ.

P. 59(e) motion to reconsider the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his civil

action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17, denying his counseled Rule 59(e) motion, and denying leave to file

a second amended complaint; and denying his alternative request for leave to file a third

amended complaint. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Okanes v. Soc’y for Worldwide Interbank

Fin. Telecomm. SC, No. 1:21-cv-00285-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 1, 2021 & entered

Dec. 3, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Okanes has not appealed from the district court’s orders dismissing his action or denying his first counseled Rule 59(e) motion.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished